A Guide to Vaccines and Vaccine Controversies

Stories about vaccines appear in the news at times and they can make parents wonder whether it is safe to vaccinate their children.  We at Pediatric Affiliates want to make it clear that we feel vaccines are among the most important things we do to protect your children's health and that we consider them to be extremely safe.  The following information is a detailed argument about the reasons we feel this way.  It may be a little technical at times but we have tried to make it comprehensive and complete and hope you find it useful.

Table of Contents:

 How do vaccines work

       Vaccines work along a principle that is familiar to people when they think about chickenpox (now far less common thanks to vaccines).  As many people know, once one has been sick with chickenpox, they are very unlikely to get sick with it again because their immune system (the cells that fight infection) has learned to recognize the infection and is ready to fight it should one get re-exposed.  Our immune system recognizes the infection by learning to recognize small proteins that are characteristic of that specific infection.

       Vaccines work the same way, exposing the recipient to an infection or parts of an infection so that their immune system will know what to look for in the future.  Nearly all vaccines given in this country are inactivated infections or just particles from the infection (those specific small proteins to train our immune system).  As a result, you can not get sick with hepatitis B or influenza from the vaccines, which are in this category. 

       The only live virus vaccines on the regular vaccination schedule in the U.S. are the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and the chickenpox vaccine.  These vaccines are actually live viruses but in a significantly weakened state.  Since they are live viruses it is possible to get true signs of the infection afterwards (fever, rash) but because these vaccines are significantly weakened, the reactions are infrequent and nearly always very mild when they actually do occur.  The trade off is that the MMR and chickenpox vaccines provide immunity more efficiently than non-live infection vaccines.  Children who get the chickenpox vaccine usually only need one shot to provide lifetime immunity. 

       In contrast, kids need 4 doses of polio vaccine to be protected before they start school and tetanus boosters are recommended every 10 years (both polio and tetanus are non-live vaccines).  Booster doses basically help your immune system learn to recognize the infection or refresh the memory of your immune system which might otherwise forget how to recognize the infection.  Vaccine schedules are designed to minimize the number of vaccines given while protecting as many people as possible.  For instance, the polio vaccine is recommended at 2, 4 and 6 months old.  Statistically, perhaps 60% of babies will be immune after getting 1 dose, 90% will be immune after 2 doses and 98% after 3 doses (not actual figures).

 

Vaccine effectiveness

While infectious diseases still afflict us and our children today, the rates at which people die or have serious health damage from infections has decreased dramatically in the last century.  The three innovations that changed the world to allow this are: proper sanitation, antibiotics and vaccines. Vaccines have been so effective that a disease like smallpox has been eradicated worldwide and we hope polio is soon to follow.  Measles is the third most deadly infection in the world today (ranking it behind just tuberculosis and malaria), killing over 500,000 people each year worldwide.  But because of immunizations, measles is now incredibly rare in this country.  And worldwide one could predict that 2 million deaths from measles are prevented by vaccination each yearLook at the following chart to see how cases of infections have changed in the U.S. for diseases with vaccines*:

 

Disease

Average number of infections each year in the U.S.

Percent decrease

 

before vaccine

2001

 
Smallpox 48,164 0 100 %
Diphtheria 175,885 2 >99 %
Pertussis (whooping cough) 147,271 7,580 95 %
Tetanus 1,313 37 97 %
Poliomyelitis (paralytic) 16,316 0 100 %
Measles 503,282 116 >99 %
Mumps 152,209 266 >99 %
Rubella 47, 745 23 >99 %
Haemophilus Influenzae B 20,000 181 >99 %

While you may be impressed by the chart above, you may think "well, the vaccines have done their part, my child isn't going to get diptheria today, why should they get the vaccines now?"  There are many answers to that:

  • Many of these diseases still exist and by not continuing to vaccinate the population they will come back.  In the past 20 years, countries including Japan, the U.K., and Sweden had periods where less people got the measles and pertussis vaccines and they saw a resurgence of these infections.  In fact, whooping cough (pertussis) is actually making a comeback in this country (as you can see in the chart above) and is currently thought to account for a relatively large percentage of chronic cough infections.  This is not so much a result of kids not getting vaccinated in this country as much as our relatively recent realization that adults and teens carry and get sick regularly with this infection and keep it around.  While the pertussis vaccine is part of the tetanus booster children get, it has only recently been added to teen and adult tetanus boosters in the past year.  Hopefully with this new vaccine, pertussis cases will be cut to the level of other infections on the chart.

  • Many vaccines protect against infections more common in other countries (hepatitis B) or in nature (tetanus) that are likely to stay around in the near future no matter how good a job of vaccination we do in this country.  Some may not happen regularly in this country but may pop up in outbreaks (hepatitis A).

  • Newer vaccines are fighting against infections that have been real problems in our lifetime and are changing the face of illness in kids.  Even 15 years ago haemophilus influenzae B was a common cause of bacterial meningitis is children, causing hearing loss, brain damage and death.  These days that form of meningitis is rare and it also means that other infections like pneumonia and even ear infections are less common because that bacteria has been mostly eliminated.  In the past 5 years, new vaccines against s. pneumonia and n. meningitis promise to do the same for these bacteria.

Vaccine safety

Vaccines can cause soreness, fussiness and fevers in the first few days after they are administered.  This is likely due to the particles in the vaccine causing the immune system reaction that will allow it to produce the cells to recognize the infection in the future.  The live virus vaccines (MMR and varicella), because they are real although weak viruses, can cause fever and rash 1-2 weeks after they are given but should not cause significant infection in people with normal immune systems.  Any medicine or vaccine always carries the risk of an allergic reaction, but these reactions generally cannot be predicted (except that people with egg allergies might be sensitive to the flu vaccine).  Beyond those we do not associate other specific reactions with vaccines (click here to see the safety handouts on each vaccine).  Except for the live virus vaccines mentioned above, doctors do not think you can get sick with the infection itself from the vaccine because they are not living infections.  Kids  get sick frequently, especially when they go to day care or school and also after visiting doctors office waiting rooms.  There are many germs in all these places, and these germs are likely the source of infections that follow vaccinations (we keep our offices as clean as possible but doctor's offices are certainly not sterile).  

So why do people and news stories talk about other risks?  Part of the reason vaccine controversies survive in the news (which likes to create hype) is because:

  • It is scientifically impossible to prove one thing absolutely can not cause a second thing.  Extensive studies are done prior to the release of vaccines.  All vaccines given in the population are cataloged and agencies exist for the reporting of all adverse reactions in the community - not just in this country but in other countries around the world.  Through these channels the vaccines currently given have not been shown to be associated with autism, seizures, learning disorders, etc.  However, to say that there is absolutely no relation with these or any other condition would require studying every person currently alive and who will be alive in the future.  For instance, some kids get vaccines and get autism but some do not get vaccines and get autism and most get vaccines and don't get autism but to the best scientific evidence available (see below) there is no relation between vaccines and autism.

  • Safety is always a relative term.  Nothing in life has absolutely no risk - whether you are going skydiving, riding your bicycle, or eating salmon for dinner.  In medicine we often judge safety in terms of these risks weighed against benefits.  Riding your bicycle is fun and good exercise which is good for you and if done properly (wearing a helmet, reflective light clothing at night, etc.) probably worth what small risk it carries.  For many skydiving, while probably fun, might be a little too risky to try.  Vaccines, from the best of our scientific study, do not carry significant risks but do have the real benefit of protecting our children against real and deadly infections.

Vaccine Monitoring

          In addition to the drug companies that produce and test the drugs, drug safety is monitored in this country by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as well as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Institute of Medicine and other agencies.  Vaccines are also monitored by agencies in other countries.  Reactions to vaccines in the general population are reported through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System to the CDC. 

          A few examples of specific vaccines from the past 20 years are helpful to illustrate how these reactions really are being monitored:

  • DTP

    • the vaccine most likely to cause fevers was the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) vaccine.  While having fever some kids had seizures but through further study it was felt that these kids were likely to have febrile seizures and seizure problems separate from the vaccine.  By causing fever the DTP vaccine merely unmasked seizure tendencies that already existed.  However, to minimize these fever reactions, a new acellular pertussis vaccine (the DTaP) vaccine was developed.  The DTaP is the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine we give today and there are much less fever reactions to this form.

  • Oral polio -

    • Vaccination against polio is unique in that both a live (but weakened virus) vaccine and an inactivated (dead virus) vaccine were developed.  When polio was a prevalent problem, the live vaccine worked better than the inactivated vaccine.  This was because the weak but live virus could actually be spread from person to person so that people in the same house might actually "catch" the vaccine if they hadn't already gotten it (just like one may "catch" a stomach virus).  However, the downside to the live vaccine was that in very rare cases it was possible for someone to get sick with polio from it.  But when polio was common, far more people were protected by the live vaccine than got sick from the vaccine.

    • However, once polio became rare, the CDC monitoring reports of reactions to vaccines saw that the risk of getting sick from the live vaccine was greater than the risk of getting true polio.  Since the inactivated vaccine did not carry the risk of making people sick while at the same time protecting them against polio infection, the U.S. switched to give all polio vaccines in the inactivated form.

  • Rotavirus

    • Rotavirus is a diarrhea illness common in infants and toddlers that can lead to fevers and dehydration.  This illness causes many hospitalizations in the U.S.  While deaths due to rotavirus occur in underdeveloped countries, deaths from rotavirus are very rare in this country.  

    • A vaccine was developed against rotavirus in the 1990's to protect against this infection.  However, after it was introduced, case reports indicated a possible link to intussusception, a surgical condition where a blockage develops in the intestines that may need surgical correction.  This link was suspected even though it happened in fewer than 0.02% of infants vaccinated.  Since rotavirus is not generally a deadly infection in this country, it was felt that this possible risk was too great and this vaccine was withdrawn from the market.

These examples illustrate how vaccines schedules are modified and improved over time and how reactions to vaccines are monitored carefully.  Decisions about the risks and benefits of vaccines are always considered and if a vaccine is not considered to be safe enough, it is removed from the schedule.

 

What about other concerns that have been raised in the news?

 

  • Autism and MMR (measles, mumps, rubella vaccine) -  This is an example of how bad science and associations can be perpetuated without being substantiated.

    • Autism - autism is a condition where children have problems with speech and social interactions.  The condition probably is present from infancy but the symptoms usually become apparent when kids are 12-24 months old and don't talk or interact like other children.  To the best of all current research, doctors do not know what causes autism - there are likely both genetic and environmental factors.

    • The controversy about MMR is all a result of a very small study published in the Lancet journal in 1998 by Wakefield.  Basically, Wakefield asked questions of the parents of 12 children with autism, asking the parents what they recalled having happened around the time they noticed the onset of their children's autistic symptoms.  As previously mentioned, the symptoms of autism are usually apparent between 12-24 months of age (because this is when kids usually start to talk and are more interactive).  So the article noted (not even as its main conclusion but just as a single point) that 8 of 12 parents recalled the kids having gotten their 12-month-old MMR shot.  

    • The recollection of 8 parents about an event timed to occur at the same time as one would expect symptoms to appear is a far cry from evidence of a link but it was enough for the media to create a controversy.  The article itself was withdrawn from the Lancet because its assertions were felt to suffer from bias.  However, a multitude of studies were done as a result to see if there was a link.  Extensive research on the subject has continued to find no link between MMR vaccine and autism.  A report by the Institute of Medicine in 2001 said that there was no evidence to suggest MMR vaccine causes autism or autistic spectrum disorders and that they could find no biologically plausible method how the vaccine could cause autism.

  • Autism and Thimerosol

    • Thimerosol is a preservative that had been used in vaccines and other biological products since the 1930's to protect the vaccines from contamination.  Thimerosol is an organic compound of ethyl-mercury that was only present in low doses in vaccines and in studies was shown to be eliminated quickly from the body (as compared to methyl-mercury, more typically thought of in mercury poisoning which stays in the body a long time after exposure).  However, since more vaccines are given in recent years then in the past, there was concern that the total dose of ethyl-mercury an infant would get through vaccines would be higher than the FDA guidelines for methyl-mercury.  Because of this calculation (and not because any harm was documented or linked) the American Academy of Pediatrics in 1999 recommended removal of thimerosol from vaccines.  All formulations of childhood vaccines for children under 6 years old and under (except for the influenza vaccine for children over 3 years old) have been thimerosol free since 2002.

    • However, the call to remove thimerosol from vaccines created controversy.  Many studies were done to evaluate any possible link between thimerosol and autism.  A summary of a few studies as reported in the Institute of Medicine report as summarized by the New York Times are as follows:

      • "A study by the World Health Organization ... examined the health records of 109,863 children born in Britain from 1988 to 1997 and found that children who had received the most thimerosal in vaccines had the lowest incidence of developmental problems like autism.
      • Another study examined the records of 467,450 Danish children born from 1990 to 1996. It found that after 1992, when the country's only thimerosal-containing vaccine was replaced by one free of the preservative, autism rates rose rather than fell.
      • In one of the most comprehensive studies, a 2003 report by C.D.C. scientists examined the medical records of more than 125,000 children born in the United States from 1991 to 1999. It found no difference in autism rates among children exposed to various amounts of thimerosal."

    In summary, while the prevalence of autism has certainly increased in recent times, the best evidence from large studies show no connection between MMR vaccine or thimerosol and autism.  Doctors unfortunately do not know the cause of autism and it is possible that environmental exposures play a role in this condition.  More research is needed to evaluate the many potentially harmful things are children are exposed to regularly - from the air we breathe to the food we eat, etc.  To focus excessively on vaccines as a cause, which are proven to save kids lives from real illness, is likely an oversimplification.

Other Questions

 

Q. Is it safe for a young child to receive multiple vaccines at once?

A. All available research suggests that giving multiple vaccines simultaneously is effective and safe.  Infants and children are exposed to a multitude of germs daily from food, viruses and bacteria.  Even getting 5 vaccines at once is a small number of exposures compared to the exposures they contact naturally each day.

 

Q. Could it be a good idea to separate vaccines onto multiple days?

A. There is no evidence that it is safer to separate vaccinations into multiple days.  Therefore, the only likely affect of giving vaccines on extra occasions is that your children are more likely to be exposed to waiting room germs and be more afraid of doctor's offices.

Q. Could it be better for my child to get sick with the infections "naturally"?

A.  The chickenpox vaccine is a good case for this question.  Many people think of chickenpox as a relatively benign illness where you miss school for 2 weeks and are itchy.  However, complications from chickenpox occur regularly, including pneumonia, meningitis and encephalitis.  Complications from the chickenpox are more likely to occur if one gets sick with chickenpox at an older age.  Even with chickenpox being a live virus vaccine, the rates of complications are far less with the vaccine than to get the infection naturally.  With chickenpox now being much less common because of immunization, to not get this vaccine puts one at risk for getting sick with chickenpox when they are older and more likely to have complications.

Q. Could it be a good idea to wait until my child is older and stronger before giving them their vaccines?

A.  This question shows how far people's perceptions have changed because vaccines have been so effective in preventing infections.  The vaccine schedule is created to protect children from illnesses at the ages they are most vulnerable to the infection and at an age where the vaccines will be safe and effective.  It is the infections that children need protection from, not from the vaccines themselves!

We hope this page has been helpful in explaining why we feel vaccines are safe, effective and important for your child's health.  If you have specific concerns or questions not answered by this page, we welcome the chance to discuss them with you so your child can be protected.

References

Red Book 2003, Report of the Committee on Infectious Disease, American Academy of Pediatrics, 26th edition, 2003

Institute of Medicine, Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism, 2004

New York Times, Gardiner Harris and Anahad O'Connor, "On Autism's Cause, It's Parents vs. Research", 6/25/05

Vaccinecheck.org (check out Dr. Fineberg's website for further information about vaccines)